government
healthcare
social media
service provider
fine
education
finance
dark web
law enforcement
retail
web
telecoms
phama
travel
manufacturing
operating system
charity
insurance
legal
app
tech
gaming
transport
publishing
utilities
story
hacked
malware
unauthorised access
ransomware
vulnerability
accidental disclosure
phishing
unsecured database
poor security
insider threat
unsecured server
hacked email
lost device
website hacked
identity theft
stolen documents
ddos
Trojans
financial
inside job
spear phishing
RDP
skimming
spyware
cyber attack
privacy
breach notification
security flaw
legislation
poor operations
user credentials
physical security
customer data
third party
Cryptocurrency
enforcement
email hacked
insecure storage
court action
encryption
fraud
VPN
passwords
zero day
state hacking
3rd parties
employee data
remote working
stolen data
The Secret IRS Files Trove of NeverBeforeSeen Records Reveal How the Wealthiest Avoid Income Tax ProPublica
Medhelp will pay 12 million after the 1177 leak
Fin(d)ing Locatefamily.com: Dutch DPA imposes â¬525,000 fine for not having a GDPR representative
(Peachstate Pays $25,000 to Settle Potential HIPAA violation
City pays $350,000 after suing “hackers” for opening Dropbox link it sent them | Ars Technica
Dutch privacy watchdog fines Booking.com €475K – POLITICO
Restaurant fined 2000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Hamburger Volksbank eG fined Unknown Euros for breaching Art. 21 GDPR - Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights
Hamburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH (HVV GmbH) fined 20,000 Euros for breaching Art. 33 GDPR, Art. 34 GDPR - Insufficient fulfilment of data breach notification obligations
Facebook Germany GmbH fined 51,000 Euros for breaching Art. 37 GDPR - Lack of appointment of data protection officer
Unknown fined 294,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
AMADOR RECREATIVOS, S.L fined 3,600 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Employer fined 9,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Employer fined 20,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Vodafone España, S.A.U. fined 40,000 Euros for breaching Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Vodafone España, S.A.U. fined 30,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
TELEFONICA MOVILES ESPAÑA, S.A.U. fined 48,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) a) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
VODAFONE ONO, S.A.U. fined 48,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
VODAFONE ONO, S.A.U. fined 36,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Vodafone España, S.A.U. fined 21,000 Euros for breaching Art. 6 (1) GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Doctor fined 14,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 GDPR, Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Newspaper fined 10,000 Euros for breaching Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
State Hospital fined 5,000 Euros for breaching Art. 15 GDPR - Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights
Asesoría Alpi-Clúa S.L. fined 3,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 32 (1) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Vodafone España, S.A.U. fined 60,000 Euros for breaching Art. 6 (1) GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Hackers hacked into the system of three Prague polyclinics, e-mails and ordering system do not work
Heredad de Urueña S.A. fined 2000 Euros for breaching Art. 13 GDPR - Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations
Cultural association fined 3,000 Euros for breaching Art. 6 (1) a) GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
School fined 1,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR, Art. 6 (1) GDPR, Art. 8 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Certime S.A. fined 5,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) b) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Google facing $5bn lawsuit over Chrome's not-so-incognito mode | TechRadar
NBQ Technology, S.A.U. fined 12,000 Euros for breaching Art. 6 (1) GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Private Person fined 1,500 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
Vodafone España, S.A.U. fined 8,150,000 Euros for breaching Art. 28 GDPR, Art. 24 GDPR, Art. 44 GDPR, Art. 21 LSSI, Art. 48 (1) b) LGT, Art. 21 GDPR, Art. 23 LOPDGDD - Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights
Epsilon agrees to pay $150m fine to DoJ for selling data to fraudsters | News | GRC World Forums
Xfera Moviles S.A. fined 90,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 17 GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Equifax Iberica S.L. fined 50,000 Euros for breaching Art. 6 (1) f) GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Filigrana Comunicación S.L.U. fined 8,000 Euros for breaching Art. 6 (1) GDPR, Art. 13 GPDR, Art. 14 GDPR - Insufficient fulfilment of information obligations
Hospital Campogrande DE fined 10,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
VfB Stuttgart 1893 AG fined 300,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (2) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
