government
healthcare
social media
service provider
fine
education
finance
law enforcement
dark web
retail
web
phama
telecoms
charity
travel
manufacturing
insurance
operating system
app
legal
tech
gaming
publishing
transport
utilities
story
hacked
malware
unauthorised access
ransomware
vulnerability
accidental disclosure
phishing
unsecured database
poor security
insider threat
unsecured server
hacked email
lost device
identity theft
website hacked
ddos
stolen documents
Trojans
financial
inside job
spear phishing
RDP
skimming
spyware
cyber attack
breach notification
privacy
security flaw
legislation
poor operations
user credentials
physical security
customer data
third party
Cryptocurrency
enforcement
email hacked
insecure storage
court action
encryption
fraud
VPN
passwords
zero day
state hacking
3rd parties
employee data
remote working
stolen data
Alaska Personal Information Protection Act - Consumer Protection Laws
Programmer who stole drive containing 1 million bank records gets 42 months
Dubai Municipality Wikipedia
MTAS system 'catastrophic' - junior doctors online recruitment scandal - Channel 4 News
Georgia Personal Identity Protection Act. (OCGA § 10-1-910)
Australian National University hit by huge data breach
Protecting Children’s Privacy Under COPPA: A Survey on Compliance
D.C. Law Library - § 28–3852. Notification of security breach.
Hospital cyberattack investigation complete no formal review needed
Opening a Can of Whoop Ads Detecting and Disrupting a Malvertising Campaign Distributing Backdoors Mandiant
Hospital systems slowly coming back online after October cyberattack
Unknown fined 118 Euros for breaching Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Social Insurance Agency fined 50,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Madrileña Red de Gas fined 12,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Slovak Telekom fined 40,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Unknown fined Unknown Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR, Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Restaurant (SANTI 3000, S.L.) fined 9,600 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) a) GDPR, Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
ENDESA (energy supplyer) fined 60,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Vodafone España, S.A.U. fined 27,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) d) GDPR - Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights
Debt collecting agancy (GESTIÓN DE COBROS, YO COBRO SL) fined 60,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) f) GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Vodafone España, S.A.U. fined 5,000 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) d) GDPR - Non-compliance with general data processing principles
