government healthcare social media service provider fine education law enforcement finance dark web security web retail app phama insurance telecoms charity travel manufacturing legal operating system law tech ransomware publishing
story hacked malware unauthorised access vulnerability accidental disclosure phishing unsecured database poor security insider threat unsecured server hacking hacked email lost device financial identity theft website hacked ddos stolen documents breached Trojans inside job RDP spear phishing spyware
cyber attack breach notification privacy security flaw legislation poor operations user credentials physical security customer data third party Cryptocurrency enforcement email hacked insecure storage court action encryption VPN fraud zero day passwords 3rd parties state hacking employee data remote working stolen data

Pacific Pulmonary Medical Group
National Diagnostic Imaging US Teleradiology Company
Opening a Can of Whoop Ads Detecting and Disrupting a Malvertising Campaign Distributing Backdoors Mandiant
Unknown fined 118 Euros for breaching Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Social Insurance Agency fined 50,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Madrileña Red de Gas fined 12,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Slovak Telekom fined 40,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Restaurant (SANTI 3000, S.L.) fined 9,600 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) a) GDPR, Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing