government
healthcare
social media
service provider
fine
education
law enforcement
finance
dark web
security
web
retail
app
phama
insurance
telecoms
charity
travel
manufacturing
legal
operating system
law
tech
ransomware
publishing
story
hacked
malware
unauthorised access
vulnerability
accidental disclosure
phishing
unsecured database
poor security
insider threat
unsecured server
hacking
hacked email
lost device
financial
identity theft
website hacked
ddos
stolen documents
breached
Trojans
inside job
RDP
spear phishing
spyware
cyber attack
breach notification
privacy
security flaw
legislation
poor operations
user credentials
physical security
customer data
third party
Cryptocurrency
enforcement
email hacked
insecure storage
court action
encryption
VPN
fraud
zero day
passwords
3rd parties
state hacking
employee data
remote working
stolen data
Pacific Pulmonary Medical Group
National Diagnostic Imaging US Teleradiology Company
Opening a Can of Whoop Ads Detecting and Disrupting a Malvertising Campaign Distributing Backdoors Mandiant
Unknown fined 118 Euros for breaching Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing
Social Insurance Agency fined 50,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Madrileña Red de Gas fined 12,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Slovak Telekom fined 40,000 Euros for breaching Art. 32 GDPR - Insufficient technical and organisational measures to ensure information security
Restaurant (SANTI 3000, S.L.) fined 9,600 Euros for breaching Art. 5 (1) a) GDPR, Art. 6 GDPR - Insufficient legal basis for data processing